On the morning of February 11, 2013, Christine Belford, a 39-year-old mother of three, walked into the New Castle County Courthouse in Wilmington, Delaware, for a child-support hearing her ex-husband had asked the court to schedule. She brought a friend, Laura Mulford, for support. Neither woman made it out of the lobby.
What federal prosecutors would prove was not a sudden act of violence but the end point of a campaign that had run for more than three years, conducted largely over the internet, by four members of one family. When it was over, a Delaware jury returned a verdict that had never been returned anywhere in the United States before.
A custody fight, a kidnapping, and a prison cell
Christine Belford and David Matusiewicz, an optometrist from Newark, Delaware, divorced in 2007, and the case moved into Family Court alongside a custody dispute. That August, David and his mother, Lenore Matusiewicz, took the couple’s three daughters and left the country. In March 2009 they were found living in a motor home in Nicaragua, arrested, and returned to Delaware. Both pleaded guilty to charges connected to the kidnapping; David was sentenced in December 2009 to 48 months in federal prison.
According to the evidence prosecutors later presented, the campaign against Belford began within days of that sentencing, from inside a prison cell. David enlisted his father, Thomas, his mother, Lenore, and his sister, Amy Gonzalez. Over the next three years the family mailed letters, sent emails, built websites and posted YouTube videos accusing Belford of abusing her own children, and sent the accusations to her friends, acquaintances and lawyer. Gonzalez prepared false polygraph reports. The family recruited third parties to watch Belford and hired a private investigator to surveil her home. In August 2011, Delaware Family Court terminated David Matusiewicz’s parental rights and called the abuse allegations baseless. Belford told family, friends and her lawyer that she feared for her life.
February 11, 2013
In January 2013, David, then living in Texas, got permission from his probation officer to travel to Delaware for a hearing on his own petition to reduce child support. He did not mention that his parents were coming too. Investigators later found in the family’s two vehicles ammunition, a military-style knife, three sets of restraints in progressively smaller sizes, a bulletproof vest, an electric shock device, gas cans, a shovel, photographs of Belford’s children and home, and a spiral notebook logging the family’s surveillance of her.
Shortly after 7:30 a.m., David and Thomas Matusiewicz entered the courthouse lobby. David cleared security and went upstairs. Thomas stayed below. When Christine Belford entered, he shot her several times, killing her, then shot Laura Mulford as she tried to run. Two Delaware Capitol Police officers were wounded exchanging fire with him. Thomas Matusiewicz died on the sidewalk outside of a self-inflicted gunshot wound.
A verdict with no precedent
The FBI’s Baltimore Field Office and the Delaware State Police traced the websites, videos, letters and the network of supporters the family had built. The legal question was new: the gunman was dead, so could the relatives who spent three years posting, mailing and emailing be held responsible for a murder none of them committed? In the summer of 2015, after a five-week trial, a federal jury convicted David Matusiewicz, Lenore Matusiewicz and Amy Gonzalez on every count, including cyberstalking resulting in death, a Violence Against Women Act provision that had never produced a conviction before.
On February 18, 2016, U.S. District Judge Gerald A. McHugh sentenced all three to life in prison. Lenore Matusiewicz, sentenced at her hospital bedside, died while her appeal was pending. On September 7, 2018, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the remaining convictions and sentences in a 77-page precedential opinion, holding that the stalking campaign was both the actual and the proximate cause of Christine Belford’s death.
Watch the full case file
Do you think the law is doing enough to stop a campaign like this before it reaches a courthouse lobby? Tell us in the comments on YouTube.
Related reading
No well-reviewed book has been written about this case specifically, so this is an honest search rather than a recommendation of a particular title: Books on the Matusiewicz–Belford case and cyberstalking. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Sources
- U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Public Affairs, “Three Family Members Receive Life Sentences for Courthouse Murder Conspiracy,” Feb. 19, 2016
- U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Delaware, “Third Circuit Court of Appeals Affirms Landmark Cyberstalking Resulting in Death Conviction in Matusiewicz Case,” Sept. 7, 2018
- U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Delaware, 2015 conviction announcement
- FBI, “A Web of Intimidation: Landmark Cyberstalking Case Results in Life Sentences for Three Family Members,” Apr. 12, 2016
- Associated Press reporting on the Third Circuit ruling, Sept. 7, 2018
- Delaware Attorney General’s Office release on the no-contact order against Lenore Matusiewicz
Image credits: David Matusiewicz booking photo (Delaware public record, as republished in AP/Newark Post coverage); New Castle County Courthouse (Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0); all other images are clearly labelled illustrative stock (Wikimedia Commons CC/public domain, IAEA Imagebank CC BY 2.0). No news broadcast footage was used. Narration in the video is AI-synthesised and the research is AI-assisted.